Reproducible but Dynamic Positioning of Specific Sequences in Mitotic Chromosomes
Reference:
Dietzel, S. and Belmont, A.S. (2001)
"Reproducible but dynamic positioning of DNA within chromosomes during mitosis,"
Nature Cell Biology In press.
Background:
How DNA is folded into chromosomes is unknown. Mitotic
chromosome banding demonstrates reproducibility in longitudinal compaction
at several megabasepairs (Mbp) resolution. Less clear is whether DNA sequences
are targeted laterally to specific locations. In vitro chromosome assembly
of prokaryotic DNA suggests lack of sequence requirements for chromosome
condensation, implying an absence of DNA targeting. However, protein extraction
experiments suggest binding of specific sequences to a chromosome scaffold.
Chromosome banding patterns, using dyes with differential sequence specificity,
were interpreted as resulting from alignment of AT rich sequences within
a partially helically folded chromosome scaffold. Fluorescence in situ hybridization
(FISH) experiments, though, at best have shown only slight deviation from
a random, lateral sequence distribution 5, perhaps due to technical limitations.
Results:
Using gene amplified chromosome regions, we have shown highly
reproducible targeting of specific chromosome segments to the metaphase
chromatid axis, but localization of these segments to the prophase and telophase
chromosome periphery. Unfolding intermediates during anaphase and telophase
suggest sequence repositioning occurs through the global uncoiling of an
underlying chromatid structure.

Mitotic chromosomes stained with the
DNA dye, DAPI, are in red. Lac operator tagged sequences binding GFP-lac
repressor are in green. Left panel shows labeled sequences localizing to
the axis of the early anaphase chromatids. Middle
panel shows late anaphase plate in which GFP signal assumes more of a zig-zag
pattern. Right panel shows telophase nuclei where axial location is lost
and GFP spots frquently localize to chromosome periphery.
Details:
Previously we described development of an in vivo labeling
method for localizing specific DNA sequences using a GFP - lac repressor
fusion protein bound to a lac operator direct repeat. We combined this approach
with gene amplification to investigate mitotic condensation and decondensation
of labeled sequences in structurally well preserved chromosomes. The simultaneous
detection of multiple GFP signals within the same chromosome arm allowed
recognition of highly reproducible targeting of specific sequences within
mitotic chromosomes in one of the cell clones generated.
The EP1-4 cell line, a derivative of CHO cells containing
a single vector copy insertion of a plasmid containing a lac op direct repeat,
was subjected to gene amplification. This was followed by transfection and
selection of stable clones expressing GFP-lac repressor. Two clones were
characterized.
Both clones showed localized clusters of labeled dots within
interphase nuclei. Transgenes in both clones consistently located at the
border of chromatin domains, but otherwise no pattern was obvious. Surprisingly,
metaphase chromosomes in Ah clone cells showed a strikingly non-random alignment
of labeled dots. Specifically, the GFP label was found lying along the axis
of the chromatids with the diameter of the GFP signal close to the resolution
limit of the light microscope and roughly half the chromatid diameter. None
of the metaphase cells from the Cd clone showed this alignment. Instead,
the GFP spots were distributed apparently randomly within metaphase chromosomes.
In early prophase and late anaphase/telophase spots in the
Ah clone frequently localized to the chromosome periphery. In anaphase GFP
staining showed changes from a linear to more curvilinear or zig-zag patterns.
At later stages of decondensation in late anaphase / early telophase examples
of discontinuous patches of GFP staining which nevertheless connect into
a roughly co-linear or zig-zag pattern were observed; these patches located
at the edges of the underlying, condensed chromatid substructure but in
areas which are centrally located relative to the larger envelope of DAPI
staining.
Conclusions:
We have described a highly reproducible targeting of sequences
to the metaphase chromatid axis. Key to recognition of this targeting was
our experimental approach in which a structurally nonperturbing, in vivo
labeling method allowed simultaneous visualization of many gene amplified
copies of a marked transgene to the chromosome axis. Independent of the
underlying mechanism of the axial positioning our results demonstrate a
high level of accuracy and reproducibility in the architecture of mitotic
chromosomes. Moreover, we observed a dynamic redistribution of location
towards the chromosome exterior in prophase and anaphase. This contradicts
predictions of the original radial loop model in which sequences forming
the bases of the DNA loops would be located at the central axis throughout
mitosis. Rather, this redistribution demonstrates that a major structural
transition occurs at a late stage of chromosome condensation between prophase
and metaphase. This structural transition is consistent with all chromosome
models involving coiling/uncoiling of an underlying chromatid, including
coiled-radial loop and coiled-chromonema models.