| |
Chapter 4
A SIMPLE MODEL TO PREDICT THE EFFECTS OF ACUTE OZONE EXPOSURE ON WHEAT
PHOTOSYNTHESIS
INTRODUCTION
The IPCC Report suggests tropospheric ozone concentrations in the
northern hemisphere have been rising for the last three decades at an annual rate of 1-2%,
and acute exposures of concentrations exceeding 100 nmol mol-1 have
been reported across Europe and North America during the vegetative growth periods of
spring and early summer (Watson et al., 1990; PORG, 1993). The need to understand
and predict the effects of rising carbon dioxide concentrations on wheat and other crops
is well recognised, but in reality these effects will be complicated by rising ozone
concentrations (Campbell et al., 1988; Drake and Leadley, 1991; Lawlor and
Mitchell, 1991; Long 1991; Harley et al., 1992). At present there is a lack of
experimental data on the interactive effects of temperature, CO2 and
ozone on photosynthesis and forward prediction of such possible effects requires the
development of mechanistic models. For example, the mechanistic model of Farquhar et al.
(1980) and Farquhar and von Caemmerer (1982) for carbon dioxide uptake and assimilation by
leaves has been widely used and validated (von Caemmerer and Farquhar, 1981; Long, 1985;
Harley et al., 1992). This mechanistic model of leaf photosynthesis forms the basis
of the carbon input sub-models of several key models developed for assessing the impacts
of global environmental change at stand to biome level, for example BIOMASS (McMurtie et
al., 1990), MAESTRO (Wang and Jarvis, 1990a; b), and WIMOVAC (Humphries and Long,
1995). The mechanistic photosynthesis model provides predictions of the effects and
interactions of photon flux, temperature and CO2 on leaf
photosynthesis. Perhaps this can be extended to include effects of high ozone episodes.
The earliest manifestations of acute ozone exposure on plants are
reduced rates of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance (Hill and Littlefield, 1968;
Reich et al. 1985; Olszyk and Tingey, 1986; Amundson et al., 1987; Miller,
1987). Recent work by Farage et al. (1991) and Farage and Long (1995) has
established the apparent carboxylation efficiency, determined by the in vivo
maximum capacity for carboxylation (Vcmax), as the
primary change in the photosynthetic apparatus in wheat, pea and oak leaves following
acute ozone exposure. Farage et al. (1991) measured photosynthetic parameters of
wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Avalon) exposed to acute ozone concentrations.
Fully-expanded second leaves of the main stem were separately exposed to 200 and 400 nmol
mol-1 of ozone. Measurements were conducted at photon flux densities
of 1500 µmol m-2 s-1 and leaf temperature of
20oC, for between 4 and 16 hours (Farage et al., 1991).
Although a loss of photosynthetic capacity was measured, the magnitude of this loss cannot
be predicted from ozone exposure alone, as ozone must first gain access to the leaf and
effects will therefore be a function of stomatal conductance. The effect of ozone is
further complicated by stomatal closure, observed as an exponential decline. The work of
Farage et al. (1991) and Farage and Long (1995) suggests stomatal closure may be
dependent upon changes in the mesophyll. Modelling the effects of ozone on photosynthesis
would be greatly simplified should the stomatal response be dependent upon changes
occurring in the mesophyll.
The overall aims of this chapter are to present a mechanistic model of
photosynthesis incorporating the primary effect of ozone on carboxylation efficiency, and
to use this model to predict the interactive effects of concurrent elevated concentrations
of ozone and carbon dioxide. The objectives of this chapter are fourfold. First, to
develop a basis for a mechanistic model of the effect of acute ozone exposures on leaf
photosynthesis, by establishing a relationship between ozone dose and decline in apparent
carboxylation efficiency, via changes in Vcmax. The
theory and development of the model of acute ozone effects on the Vcmax
of wheat are described, followed by a description of model parameterisation and model
integration with a leaf CO2 assimilation model. Second, to use this
relationship to test the hypothesis that stomatal closure during acute ozone exposure can
be predicted from changes in the mesophyll, that is, from changes in Vcmax.
The model simulation results are presented and discussed to determine whether the ozone
induced stomatal closure under acute exposure can be predicted from the observed changes
in the mesophyll. Third, to use the acute ozone model to simulate the interactive effects
of a four hour exposure to acute ozone concentrations and elevated [CO2]
on the rate of photosynthesis of wheat at the leaf level, via the predicted effects on Vcmax and stomatal closure. Fourth, to scale up the leaf level
model of ozone effects to the canopy level in order to assess the interactive effects of
ozone and elevated [CO2] on the productivity of a wheat canopy
simulated to be growing at a farmland site in the arable region of East Anglia, in the UK.
MODEL THEORY AND DEVELOPMENT
Ozone enters the leaf via the stomata where it is rapidly broken down
to form damaging oxidative radicals within the leaf, thereby inducing the production of
protective scavenging mechanisms (Heath, 1980; Tingey and Taylor, 1982; Guderian et al.,
1985; Scandalios, 1993). The biochemical effects of ozone within the leaf have recently
been reviewed by Heath (1994) and a summary of effects at the molecular level can be found
in Pell et al. (1994). It has been found that although limited quantities of ozone
may be absorbed by the leaf with little or no effect, higher doses damage the
photosynthetic apparatus in the mesophyll, initially by reducing the in vivo
maximum capacity for carboxylation (Hill and Littlefield, 1969; Heagle et al.,
1979; Lehnherr et al, 1987; 1988; Farage et al. 1991; Farage and Long,
1995).
A mechanism for ozone inhibition of photosynthesis is required for
prediction of future ozone effects (Heath, 1994). A possible mechanism may be the
overloading of the detoxification system above a critical rate of ozone delivery (Heath,
1994). Assuming that protection against O3 within the mesophyll
results from metabolism of the derived "active oxygen" species, then it may be
expected that the threshold for damage will be determined by the maximum rate of this
metabolism. Therefore, the threshold will be determined by the potential rate of removal
within the mesophyll, and so it is the flux into the mesophyll, the product of stomatal
conductance and external concentration, that will be of importance, and not the external
concentrations alone. Therefore, the accumulated amount of ozone entering the leaf above a
threshold flux (FO3(0)), here defined as the Effective
Ozone Dose (F'O3eff) might be expected to be linearly
related to the effect at the initial active site, that is, the reduction in Vcmax.
If such a linear relationship is found between an effective ozone dose
and the effects on Vcmax, this may then be used to
determine the dependence of ozone-induced stomatal closure on Vcmax.
Could the decline in stomatal conductance with ozone exposure be accounted for solely by
the decline in Vcmax and resulting change in Ci? If so, this would simplify the problem of modelling ozone
effects on plants. A diagram of the proposed model is represented in Figure 4.1.
To test the hypothesis that the acute ozone-induced decrease in Vcmax causes the decline in stomatal conductance via the effects on
Ci, Figure 4.1, the measured values of stomatal
conductance were to be compared with values predicted by this hypothesis.

METHODS
4.3.1 Model parameterisation: relating Vcmax
to ozone uptake
Total ozone uptake by a leaf (F'O3tot)
is determined by the product of ambient ozone concentration and stomatal conductance to
ozone, integrated over the time period of exposure:
t
F'O3tot = ò (
[O3] · gz ) . dt (4.1)
0
Whereas, the proposed effective ozone dose (F'O3eff)
is to be calculated as the ozone uptake above a threshold flux (FO3(0)):
t
F'O3eff = ò (
[O3] · gz ) - FO3(0) . dt (4.2)
0
where stomatal conductance to ozone (gz)
is determined from the stomatal conductance to H2O (gs) using the relationship:
gz = gs
/ 1.67 (4.3)
where 1.67 is the theoretical coefficient to convert the conductance of
water to ozone (Laisk et al., 1989). However, stomatal conductance does not remain
constant, and declines with the period of ozone exposure, so that the ozone dose will also
decline. Farage and co-workers (1991) describe the pattern of decline in stomatal
conductance with contiguous exposure to constant ozone concentrations. In order to
calculate ozone uptake, exponential curves were fitted to the data of the decline in
stomatal conductance with time, at both 200 and 400 nmol mol-1 ozone
concentrations, using the relationship:
gz(t) = e(mt+k)
+ n (4.4)
where k, m and n are constants. This relationship
(Equation 4.4) was only used to find the values of stomatal conductance for the
calculations to determine the amount of ozone taken up by the leaves during the experiment
conducted by Farage et al. (1991). For model simulations stomatal closure was to be
predicted by the phenomenological stomatal equations of Ball et al. (1987)
(Equation 4.5; A.11).
gs = g(0)
+ g(1) · (A · RH / Ca) (4.5)
The data points of Farage et al. (1991), together with the
fitted curves are illustrated in Figure 4.2. The resulting curvilinear relationships were
used to determine the stomatal conductance to ozone at hourly intervals. Thus, the
instantaneous flux of ozone into the leaf at hourly intervals, the product of stomatal
conductance, found by fitting the exponential curve to the data of Farage et al.
(1991) and ambient ozone concentration (Farage et al., 1991), could be determined
as follows:
FO3 = [O3] · gz (4.6)
(Figure 4.3). The resulting instantaneous flux data were then
integrated using the trapezium rule to find the total dose of ozone at hourly intervals of
time (Equation 4.1) which follow curvilinear patterns (Figure 4.4).
The relationship between the ozone-induced reduction in Vcmax measured by Farage et al. (1991) and the calculated
total ozone dose for the two concentrations of ozone also follow curvilinear patterns
(Figure 4.5). A linear relationship between the reduction in Vcmax
and an effective ozone dose, that is a dose above a threshold flux, was sought. In order
to determine a threshold flux (FO3(0)) that would give
the "best-fit" linear relationship between the percent reduction in Vcmax and effective ozone dose, threshold fluxes, between 20 and 55
µmol m-2 s-1 were simulated, at 5 µmol m-2 s-1 intervals. The calculated effective ozone
dose values for each threshold, corresponding to the data of Farage et al. (1991),
were plotted against the measured percentage reduction in Vcmax.




Regression analysis (value r2) of the
relationships between the effective ozone dose (for each FO3(0)
tried) and measured percent reduction in Vcmax were
used to determine a best correlation value of threshold flux. Regression analysis
determined the "best-fit" value of threshold flux as 40 µmol m-2
s-1, to the nearest 5 µmol m-2 s-1 (r2 = 0.97) (Figure 4.6). The change of effective
ozone doses with time for the two concentrations of ambient ozone were calculated (Figure
4.7). The linear relationship between the effective ozone dose, above a threshold flux,
and decline in Vcmax, Figure 4.8, can be compared with
Figure 4.5, which shows the relatively curvilinear relationships between total ozone dose
and decline in Vcmax, at each ozone concentration.
In order to determine the dependency of stomatal closure on reduction
in Vcmax, the linear relationship found between the
effective ozone dose and reduction in Vcmax (Equation
4.6) was incorporated into the photosynthesis module of WIMOVAC (Humphries and Long,
1995):
D Vcmax
= Kz · F'O3eff
(4.7)
where Kz is the coefficient
for ozone damage, equal to 0.09245.
This acute ozone model was subsequently incorporated as a sub-model
within the larger model of Humphries and Long (1995). Equations 4.1 and 4.4 represent
functions applied for the purpose of model construction only, and are therefore not
included in Table 4.1, which lists the acute model Equations only.
4.3.2 Predicting changes in stomatal conductance
To test the hypothesis that the decline in stomatal conductance is
caused by the decrease in Vcmax, via the effects on Ci (Figure 4.1) the ozone dependent decline in Vcmax was incorporated within the biochemical model of leaf
photosynthesis (Farquhar et al., 1980), which is included within the leaf
assimilation module of WIMOVAC (Humphries and Long, 1995) (Figure 4.9).



Table 4.1: Acute ozone model equations
t
F'O3eff = ò (
[O3] · gz ) - FO3(0) . dt
0 |
(4.2) |
gz =
gs / 1.67 |
(4.3) |
gs = g(0) + g(1) · (A ·
RH / Ca) |
(4.5) (A.11) |
D Vcmax = Kz · F'O3eff |
(4.7) |
[O3] = [O3]Pk - [O3]B
· sin (2p · (Hr - HrPk) / 16) · 12) /
24) + [O3]B |
(4.8) |

The equations for the leaf photosynthesis included within the model by
Humphries and Long (1995) are common to more than one chapter, and so are listed in
Appendix I, Equations A.1 to A.10, and are described in Chapter Two, p.42. A definition of
the symbols are listed in Appendix II and values of variables not given in Appendix II are
arrived at from equations given in Appendix I.
The regulation of stomatal conductance in WIMOVAC is based on the
phenomenological model of Ball et al. (1987), modified by Harley et al.
(1992), which relates stomatal conductance to rates of assimilation of CO2,
relative humidity (RH) and concentration of CO2 at the leaf surface (Ca) (Equation
4.5 (A.11)).
Stomatal conductance and Ci are
both interdependent and in a state of continual flux, with changes in Ci causing changes in stomatal conductance, and vice versa, until
equilibrium is reached. The climate change model of Humphries and Long (1995) predicts
these changes within a leaf iteratively using the Newton-Raphson approach (Cheney and
Kincaid, 1985). The similar interdependence of stomatal conductance and ozone uptake
within the new ozone model (Figure 4.1) is also solved iteratively using this approach.
The second order Runge-Kutta method of integration is used to integrate the flux of ozone
into the leaf that exceeds the threshold flux. Thus the accumulated effective ozone dose
is calculated with the simultaneous effects on Vcmax
and stomatal conductance via the effects on Ci.
Therefore, the method used by the model to predict ozone effects can be
summarised as follows: The photosynthesis model equations of Farquhar and co-workers,
existing within WIMOVAC, are first used to calculate the rate of CO2
assimilation. The values of Ci and stomatal
conductance are determined iteratively. The stomatal conductance values are then used to
calculate the ozone uptake, by conversion to conductance to ozone, and then multiplying by
the ambient ozone concentration. From the ozone uptake value, the ozone model equations
developed here are used to predict the decline in Vcmax.
This decline in Vcmax is determined by the
photosynthesis model equations to calculate the stomatal closure, but because this is also
dependent upon Ci, Ci
and stomatal conductance are again solved iteratively. Another iteration between the
stomatal conductance, ozone uptake and effect on Vcmax
is performed before a final value for stomatal conductance at the end of a time interval
is established. The resulting value of stomatal conductance is used to calculate the
uptake of ozone within the passed time interval, and is stored as the stomatal conductance
value for the start of the next time interval.
In order to compare the measured and predicted decline in stomatal
conductance, the climate change model of Humphries and Long (1995) was parameterised with
the control values of Vcmax (51.3) µmol m-2 s-1, as calculated from the data of Farage et
al. (1991) and slope coefficient of stomatal conductance (g(1)),
estimated as 24.63 using the method of Ball et al. (1987) within WIMOVAC, together
with the relevant experimental conditions of photon flux density (1500 µmol m-2 s-1), temperature (20oC),
relative humidity (71%) and ambient carbon dioxide concentration (340 µmol mol-1). Thus, the only ozone input values were the ambient ozone
concentrations and times of exposure, corresponding to those used in the experiment of
Farage et al. (1991).
4.3.3 Sensitivity analysis
To assess the effect of the two main variables of the ozone model on
photosynthesis, a sensitivity analysis of the coefficient of ozone damage and threshold
flux was conducted. Both Kz and F'O3eff were increased and decreased by 50%, and resulting simulated
assimilation rates were compared with those from normal values of Kz and F'O3eff, for 4 hour exposure
to ozone concentrations varying between 0 to 400 nmol mol-1. The
standard conditions for model simulations were PFD of 1500 µmol m-2 s-1, Ca of 340 µmol mol-1
and temperature of 20oC.
4.3.4 Predicting the interactive effects of elevated [O3]
and [CO2] on photosynthesis
The mechanistic model of acute ozone effects on wheat, together with
the biochemical equations of CO2 assimilation rates of Farquhar et
al. (1980) and the phenomenological model of stomatal conductance of Ball et al.
(1987) were used to predict the interactive effects of ozone and elevated CO2
on photosynthesis, via the effects on Vcmax and
stomatal conductance. The values of the model variables of light and temperature
conditions corresponding to the ozone fumigation experiment of Farage et al. (1991)
were used for two simulations of the effects of a four hour exposure to ozone
concentrations between 0 and 400 nmol mol-1, first at Ca of 340 and then at 650 µmol mol-1. The
values of g(0) and g(1)
at elevated [CO2] had to be assumed to be the same as those at
ambient [CO2], due to a lack of measured data. Thus, the values for
the coefficients of stomatal conductance, g(0) and
g(1) were 81.1 and 24.63, respectively, for
both ambient and elevated [CO2], Table 4.2.
4.3.5 Predicting the interactive effects of elevated [O3]
and [CO2] on a wheat canopy
The leaf model of acute ozone exposure effects was scaled up to the
canopy level, using the simple sun-shade canopy model described previously in Chapter
Three (p.77) (Table B, Appendix I, p.197). The photosynthesis parameters specifically used
for the wheat canopy model are listed in Table 4.3. The [O3]
variation during one day was calculated using the simple sinusoidal relationship:
[O3] = [O3]Pk
- [O3]B · sin (2p
· (Hr - HrPk) / 16) · 12) / 24) + [O3]B (4.8) ()
where peak ozone concentration ([O3]Pk) was set to 120 nmol mol-1, and baseline ozone
concentration ([O3]B) was set to 25 nmol mol-1, based on the actual peak and base ozone concentration values measured
on a day in late June in 1992, at Sibton, a rural site in Suffolk, described as flat, open
cereal farmland (DOE, 1994). The simulation of the effects of ozone on assimilation rates
during the day were compared with predicted assimilation rates with no ozone present, at
ambient [CO2] of 340 µmol mol-1, on Julian
day 180, for latitude 52oN. The corresponding assimilation rates at
zero and acute ozone concentrations were then predicted for conditions where [CO2] is elevated to 650 µmol mol-1. The same
simulations, at low and high [CO2] for ozone and no ozone present,
were repeated at the higher peak ozone concentration of 200 µmol mol-1.
Table 4.2: Values of model parameters used in wheat leaf model
simulations.
Term |
Value |
Units |
Definition and source |
Ca |
340, 650 |
µmol mol-1 |
Ambient carbon dioxide
concentration |
Vcmax |
51.3 |
µmol m-2
s-1 |
Maximum rate of in vivo
Rubisco carboxylation.
Measured by Farage et al. (1991). |
g(0)
|
81.1 |
mmol m-2
s-1 |
Stomatal (intercept)
coefficient.
Determined from Berry et al. (1987) model. |
g(1)
|
24.63 |
mmol m-2
s-1 |
Stomatal (slope) coefficient.
Determined from Berry et al. (1987) model. |
FO3(0)
|
40 |
nmol m-2
s-1 |
Threshold flux.
Determined by regression analysis, Figure 4.6. |
Kz
|
0.09245 |
dimensionless |
Coefficient of ozone damage.
Determined by regression analysis, Figure 4.6. |
Table 4.3: Values of model parameters used in wheat canopy model
simulations.
Term |
Value |
Units |
Definition and source |
W |
52 |
o |
Latitude. |
Vcmax |
51.3 |
µmol m-2
s-1 |
Maximum rate of in vivo
Rubisco carboxylation.
Measured by Farage et al. (1991). |
g(0)
|
81.1 |
mmol m-2
s-1 |
Stomatal (intercept)
coefficient.
Determined from Berry et al. (1987) model. |
g(1)
|
24.63 |
mmol m-2
s-1 |
Stomatal (slope) coefficient.
Determined from Berry et al. (1987) model. |
FO3(0)
|
40 |
nmol m-2
s-1 |
Threshold flux.
Determined by regression analysis, Figure 4.6. |
Kz
|
0.09245 |
dimensionless |
Coefficient of ozone damage.
Determined by regression analysis, Figure 4.6. |
HrT |
14 |
hr |
Hour at which Temperature
reaches peak.
Determined for UK in Chapter 3, p.80. |
JDTstart |
130 |
Julian day |
Day of temperature start
cycle.
Determined for UK in Chapter 3, p.80. |
Tmean |
10 |
o C |
Annual mean air temperature.
Determined for UK in Chapter 3, p.80. |
TYr |
6 |
o C |
Amplitude of annual
temperature.
Determined for UK in Chapter 3, p.80. |
TD |
5 |
o C |
Mean amplitude of daily
temperature.
Determined for UK in Chapter 3, p.80. |
TDMax |
5 |
o C |
Maximum amplitude of daily
temperature.
Determined for UK in Chapter 3, p.80. |
([O3]Pk) |
120;
200 |
nmol mol-1 |
Peak [O3].
Determined for Sibton (DOE, 1994). |
([O3]B) |
25 |
nmol mol-1 |
Baseline [O3].
Determined for Sibton (DOE, 1994). |
HrO3peak |
16 |
hr |
Hour at which [O3]
reaches a peak.
Determined for Sibton (DOE, 1994). |
DJ |
180 |
Julian day |
Simulated day. |
RESULTS
4.4.1 Prediction of decline in Vcmax and
stomatal closure
Using the empirical relationship between Vcmax
and ozone exposure with the assumed mechanism of a threshold flux, and parameterising the
stomatal coefficient for only the initial control value of stomatal conductance, the
observed change in Vcmax can be closely predicted.
Ozone-induced stomatal closure can also be closely predicted (Figure 4.10) in which the
decline in measured stomatal conductance is compared with predicted values.
4.4.2 Sensitivity analysis
Changing Kz by 50% alters the
magnitude of damage to assimilation rates, above the threshold flux of ozone into the
leaf, by altering the sensitivity of Vcmax to the
effective ozone dose, Figure 4.11, top. However, changing FO3(0)
does not alter the sensitivity of Vcmax to ozone dose,
but changes the threshold above which damage occurs, Figure 4.11, bottom.
4.4.3 The interactive effects of elevated [O3]
and [CO2] on photosynthesis
The model is used to predict the effects of ozone, at concentrations of
up to 400 nmol mol-1, on the rate of CO2
assimilation, Vcmax and stomatal conductance, at both
340 and 650 µmol mol-1 [CO2]. Stomatal
conductance is predicted using the equations of Ball et al. (1987), via feedback
from reduced Vcmax caused by the damaging effects of
ozone.
The model predicts that in elevated [CO2],
exposure for four hours will cause a smaller actual and proportionate decrease in A,
Vcmax and stomatal conductance than the same exposure
in the current atmospheric [CO2] (Figure 4.12). Fours hours exposure
at 400 nmol mol-1 [O3] is predicted to
decrease A by 28.8% and 38.4% in elevated and current [CO2],
respectively. The corresponding decreases in Vcmax and
stomatal conductance are 27.8% and 36.5% for Vcmax,
and 24.4% and 33.9% for stomatal conductance, in elevated and current [CO2],
respectively.



4.4.4 The interactive effects of elevated [O3] and [CO2] on a wheat
canopy
At ambient [CO2] of 340 µmol mol-1
the effect of acute ozone at a peak concentration of 120 nmol mol-1
on assimilation rate during the day is negligible, and there is no effect under elevated
[CO2] (Figure 4.13). However, at [O3]
concentrations of 200 nmol mol-1, the damaging effects of ozone at
ambient [CO2] are only slightly greater than at 120 nmol mol-1 [O3], bearing in mind the relatively large
difference in acute [O3] (Figure 4.14).


DISCUSSION Two important findings emerge from the construction of
this ozone model within the work of this chapter. First, the use of a threshold based on
flux rather than concentration allows prediction of effects on photosynthesis at different
ozone concentrations (Figure 4.8). The first objective, to relate ozone dose and decline
in apparent carboxylation efficiency, via Vcmax, has
therefore been satisfied. Second, the decline in stomatal conductance can be predicted
from the effects of the ozone-induced decline in Vcmax
on intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Figure 4.11). Therefore the decrease in
stomatal conductance can be predicted without the need to simulate any direct effect of [O3]. Thus, the second objective is satisfied, to test the hypothesis that
stomatal closure can be predicted from changes in the mesophyll, alone.
The linear relationship between the effective ozone dose, above a
threshold flux, and reduction in Vcmax (Figures 4.8a
and b) is in contrast to the curvilinear relationship found between the total absorbed
ozone dose and reduction in Vcmax, where higher
concentrations produce greater damage for equal total absorbed doses of ozone (Figure
4.5). Curvilinear patterns have also been observed for relationships between total
absorbed ozone dose and other plant responses, for example, foliar injury of morning glory
(Nouchi and Aoki, 1979). However, the inclusion of FO3(0)
in the calculation of an effective ozone dose gives a good linear correlation between dose
and effect on Vcmax, despite the large difference in
ozone concentrations between the two treatments. This linear relationship between the
effective ozone dose and decline in Vcmax supports the
suggestion that the mechanism of acute ozone effects on photosynthesis is due to an
overwhelming of the anti-oxidant protection mechanisms operating within the mesophyll,
thereby allowing damage to the photosynthetic apparatus (Heath, 1994). Thus, if ozone
enters the leaf too rapidly it exceeds the potential maximum removal rate of damaging
radicals. It may be assumed that this maximum rate of metabolism of oxygen radical
removal, determines the critical threshold flux of ozone into the leaf.
Although exposure to high concentrations of ozone have been known for
some time to cause stomatal closure and reduced photosynthetic rates, the mechanisms for
damage had remained unclear (Darrall, 1989; Heath, 1994). Most recent research supports
the suggestion that stomatal closure occurs indirectly via the decline in photosynthetic
rates, and that Vcmax is the first site of damage
(Farage et al, 1991; Pell et al., 1992; Farage and Long, 1995). But a direct
effect of ozone on stomatal conductance had also been suggested (Moldau, 1993). The
conflicting evidence of sites of initial damage may in part be explained by variation in
experimental conditions, as factors known to influence the response to ozone include
vapour pressure deficit, growth stage and leaf section (McLaughlin and Taylor, 1981;
Beyers et al., 1992; Reiling and Davison, 1992; Nie et al., 1993; Le Thiec et
al., 1994; Younglove et al., 1994). Uneven stomatal closure across the surface
of a leaf may also generate misleading results (Moldau, 1993). For this study it was
assumed that Vcmax was the first site of damage, which
is supported by the close linear relationship found between the effective ozone dose and
the decline in Vcmax (Figure 4.8). The work of Pell et
al. (1992) further supports this assumption. This study indicates that the stomatal
closure induced by ozone exposure in fully-expanded second leaves of the main stem of Triticum
aestivum L. cv Avalon, exposed to acute ozone concentrations under light saturated
conditions, can be simulated without the need to include any direct effect on stomata.
This suggests that the effect of ozone on stomatal conductance can be fully accounted for
by the feedback through decreased photosynthetic capacity.
This finding simplifies the modelling of acute ozone exposure effects
on wheat, by providing a simple but mechanistically based model for simulating the effects
of acute ozone exposure on wheat photosynthesis under light-saturating conditions, as only
the effect of ozone on Vcmax and control values of
stomatal conductance need to be known. The assumptions that are made for the model need to
be borne in mind when applying the model to other situations. For example, further
research will be required to assess whether the mechanisms for ozone damage and protective
mechanisms against damage, which in the model presented here are represented by the values
of the Kz and FO3(0),
respectively, will be applicable under other sitiuations, where variables as diverse as
growth conditions, experimental protocols and genetic variation may influence the
biochemical responses of wheat plants to ozone exposure.
The mechanistic basis of this model provides greater confidence for
predicting interactive effects than empirical models. Thus, the model can be used to
predict the interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone concentrations on
leaf rates of photosynthesis, so meeting the third objective. At the leaf level, the model
predicts, as expected, that under elevated [CO2] the control
stomatal conductance (at [O3] = 0 nmol mol-1)
is lower than the stomatal conductance at ambient [CO2], due to the
higher concentration of substrate for photosynthesis in the ambient air, and thus allowing
stomatal closure against water loss from transpiration. The model also predicts ozone to
have a less damaging effect on assimilation rates, Vcmax
and stomatal conductance under elevated [CO2] (Figure 4.11). This is
due to the dependence of ozone uptake on stomatal conductance. So, despite the same
ambient ozone concentration at both 340 and 650 nmol mol-1 [CO2], the effective ozone dose is lower under elevated [CO2].
Therefore, in the short-term, the damaging effects of acute ozone exposure would be
expected to be less under elevated [CO2] than under ambient [CO2]. However, it should be borne in mind that the interactions between
increasing concentrations of O3 and CO2 in the
longer time span of global warming will be more difficult to assess, as the acclimation of
plants to growth conditions and the effects of genetic and phenotypic adaptation will need
to be taken into account.
The predicted effects of acute ozone on a wheat canopy growing at
Sibton indicate that acute ozone exposure for one day at the highest concentration that
occurred during 1992 was not sufficient to cause a noticeable effect on canopy
assimilation, under present carbon dioxide concentrations, and would have no effect under
[CO2] elevated to 700 µmol mol-1 (Figure
4.12). Even increasing the peak ozone concentration to the, hitherto, unprecedented level
of 200 nmol mol-1, only had a relatively small effect at ambient [CO2], and none at elevated [CO2] (Figure 4.13).
Bearing in mind that during that year at Sibton the poor air quality standard was only
exceeded on four days during the year, and that the maximum reached was no more than 120
nmol mol-1, it would seem feasible to assume that present wheat
crops are adapted to the levels of acute ozone exposure that currently occur. However,
different varieties of wheat have different tolerance levels to ozone, and future wheat
production might benefit from research into whether the relative ozone sensitivity of
various wheat cultivars is related to their values of threshold flux and/or ozone damage
coefficients. The attempt to fit the model to another species, gave ambiguous results,
with the lowest and highest ozone regime used by Farage et al. (1991) deviating by
significant margins from the 1:1 line. However, the results are sufficiently successful to
warrant further investigation.
Future research into the effects of acute ozone exposure on crop
species will need to be more focused on the objectives of the research to be undertaken.
In the past, for example, research has involved diverse approaches to measuring ozone
exposure levels, doses and effects, with the result that no one approach has been adopted,
or can be applied to all situations. Therefore, any future research into the effects of
tropospheric ozone pollution must first establish what question will be answered by the
research, and explain why the question is important.
If the model presented here were found to be applicable to other
situations, it would provide a valuable tool in the search for methods to unify ozone
research, as it would provide a method of relating all types of ozone exposure regimes,
artificial or real, to ozone response, via the effective ozone dose, and would therefore
have the potential to consolidate ozone information from previous research. Future avenues
of research could also include investigations into the applicability of the model to
variations in experimental and growth conditions, and phenomenological stage. For example,
the interactions between CO2 and ozone are known to depend upon
growth stage in wheat (McKee et al., 1995).
The model is based on data for acute ozone exposure, but chronic ozone
exposure, the exposure to ozone at relatively low concentrations over a relatively long
time span, also causes crop damage. Although the biochemical mechanisms causing damage at
chronic and acute ozone doses may be different, as indicated by the reversibility of the
decline in photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance only at chronic, low ozone doses,
damage caused by chronic exposure might still be expected to be correlated to the rate of
ozone delivery, and exceedence of a critical threshold flux of ozone into the leaf
(Sanders et al., 1992). Thus, it is proposed, in the next chapter, to test the
hypothesis that the effective ozone dose model can be applied to the effects of chronic
ozone exposure on wheat photosynthesis, using the data of I.F. McKee (unpublished).
|